Skip to main content

Conflict

Just finished reading a book on Genghis Khan (and the Making of the Modern World) by Jack Weatherford. Have always wondered why is Alexander ‘the great’? Does being good at killing people guarantee greatness in history? Unlike Alexander who conquered great armies with skill and strategy and promptly died, Genghis Khan also conquered much greater armies but lived long enough to improve and enhance the lives of his subjects in the ensuing decades peace. He and the Mongols who followed him, especially his grandson Kublai Khan, created an empire so much ahead of anything else available in the world in those days that it couldn’t stand the test of the times.

One thing that becomes clear as you read the Mongol history, which is just a slice of all history, is that humans cannot live without conflict for very long. We have an insatiable hunger for violence and war. Every stretch of peace and prosperity is the result of elimination of all opposition, as proved by Genghis Khan. And every conflict, borne out of the lethargy and complacency of peace as proved by Kublai Khan.

Moreover, it is in the interests of the rulers to keep their subjects in perpetual strife, as George Orwell showed in his ‘1984’, keeps unemployment at bay and keeps unquestioning passions raging by dividing the universe into US and THEM.

We have around 7000 years of recorded history and it hasn’t changed much over the course of it. We need wars, we need violence, unless we rewire the human brain. But do we want to banish nights, for the days seem all the more beautiful for it.

Photo credit Jochen Smolka

Comments

supersensitive said…
I am wondering if the modern day analogy to Gengis Khan is George Bush . Isn't he also waging wars and advertising it as necessary preemptive action for a safer America, never mind if the rest of the world is razed to the ground? I wouldn't be too surprised if he went down in history as one of them "greats"

Popular posts from this blog

The Obstacle Course to Being

Today, I got news that a close friend is in the early days of what might be a difficult pregnancy. Richard Dawkins’ opening remarks of his book “Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder” came to mind. He marvels at how statistic-numbingly lucky each one of us is to have survived the odds of a sperm and a ovum fusing and giving rise to a living cell. How we are a nanoscopically small number of the total combinations that are possible for the human genome. But as a developmental biologist, for me, this is just the starting point of the great obstacle course. The hurdles that the embryo will clear in the mother’s womb to make it to light and sunshine, warmth and fragrance, and the colours and music of this, our second home.  We see numerous reminders of each step that falters, in the birth defects that abound our world (according to statistics, 3-6% of infants born). A less than perfect infant brings anguish for the mother and potential disa...

Autism: Accepting our differences

April is Autism Awareness Month Priyam was the life of the party at the day care centre. A bright-eyed boy who captured the heart of the caretakers and played with abandon. Sometime after his second birthday, all this started changing. He stopped playing with his toys, he seemed more interested in organizing them now. He stopped talking, not even responding even when called by name. He stopped smiling at people and making eye contact. Then the rhythmic movements started; rocking his body, banging his head or repeatedly tapping on the table. One day he banged his head so much that when his father came hurriedly summoned by the caretaker, there was a trickle of blood running down his face. That was his last day at the centre; they refused to keep him after that.  Nancy was different. Growing up in a family with siblings and grandparents, she was used to people. But outsiders were studiously ignored. She heard all the questions and comments, but never acknowledged them. Loud noises, r...

Real or Imagined?

Real or Imagined? Right now I have a time-lapse experiment in progress at home. An infant beginning to appreciate that a person disappearing behind the curtain is not gone, just hidden; now a toddler who enlists me in pretend-play.  The neuronal circuits necessary for imagination are busy being built. The history of western art charts an analogous course for human civilization. Early examples of art relied heavily on ‘true-to-type’ representation of reality. From ancient Greece to Rome to Renaissance, art was all about how well you could recreate in stone or canvas what you see, as you see it. Parisians graduated to Impressionism when one day in 1874, Claude Monet’s ‘Impression, Sunrise’ (Impression, soleil levant) was unveiled. A few seemingly random strokes of paint on canvas, enough for us to visualize the luminescent descent of the sun into the sea, was equated to an unfinished wallpaper by the art connoisseurs of 19th century. How is it that a few daubs of pain...