Skip to main content

Only as far as we imagine…

Only as far as we imagine…

On a clear night 20,000 years ago a man lay next to the warming fire and gazed upward; he saw a glittering dome that contained the world he lived in. Today when I lounge on my balcony and stare up at a smog-obscured-night-sky, I see an infinite universe, perhaps one of many; a vast nothingness punctuated by millions of insignificant balls of fire with finite life spans, around one of which we spend our precariously short existence. Over the last many thousands of years, we have shattered that domed-roof over our heads and thrown back its limits into the reaches of infinity. And all because we dared to imagine, imagine an infinity, imagine a time even before time.

However, our world is only as big as we can imagine. Our discoveries will remain contained within the boundaries of our imagination. If we cannot imagine it, we shall not discover it. The 17th century philosopher Benedictus Spinoza once saidif a triangle could speak, it would say, in like manner, that God is eminently triangular’. So do we, a carbon-hydrogen-based life-form think that life is where water is. We go hunting for obscure marks of water-that-once-flowed on the surface of far away planets. But is that the limit of possibilities or is that just as far as our imagination can take us?

We are a species capable of unparalleled imagination. In these last 20,000 years our brain has taken us on journeys beyond experience; shading our eyes to gaze outward as far as the edges of universe or peering inward to dissect the minutiae of that brain itself. But these boundaries were not reached in one leap but in steps, some small, some giant.

In his book A short history of nearly everything Bill Bryson says, ‘Once in a great while, a few times in history, a human mind produces an observation so acute and unexpected that people can’t quite decide which is the more amazing ­– the fact or the thinking go it.’ He is talking about Newton, but the same could be said of the other few times that mankind has taken that giant step forward. ‘The thinking of it’ is so amazing, so freeing, that like that first thin stream of water breaching the crack in the dam, it lets the rest of the river of human knowledge burst through, washing away the remnants of the dam. Our imagination leaps ahead into the space opened up, suddenly free and unrestrained, until that is, a new wall is reached. 

The history of science is littered with such ‘feats of thinking’. Like when John Snow was faced with a cholera epidemic decimating 19th century Londoners. London was a vile place full of disease. Under the ramshackle houses lining the busy streets were cesspits with years of accumulation of refuse and excrement. Snow focused his attention on one street where nearly 500 people had died in a matter of two weeks. In an inspired epidemiological study he identified the commonalities between the patients and proposed that the source of the disease was contaminated water coming from a single pump down the street. In a world that believed diseases were either punishment from the gods or a result of bad air, this required quite a leap of imagination. The authorities were reluctantly persuaded to disable the pump, saving hundreds of lives.

James Hutton lived in 18th century Britain. He trained to be a medical doctor, became a farmer but is now known to us as the man who founded modern geology. Just as we all do, he too liked a beautiful landscape of mountains and valley and rivers and lakes. But he went further to note that although wind and water constantly erodes mountains and carries the sediments down to the sea and the plains, the world has no dearth of mountains. That sometimes you can find remains of sea-creatures high up on the mountains. The Christian faith maintained that earth was created 6000 years ago and that all change happens by cataclysmic events such as the Great Flood. Hutton’s imagination came up with another explanation. After years of painstaking observation and collection of data from various parts of the Europe, he proposed that the reshaping of earth’s landscape is the result of continuous but slow incremental change wrought over millions of years. These geological changes are constantly restructuring the earths crust, moving not just mountains even continents, thus today’s oceans may become tomorrow’s mountains and vice versa.  In one fell swoop Hutton pushed the age of earth back from a mere 6,000 years to millions of years. 

Most scientific discoveries are made by a handful of people. Another handful of people are intellectually able to understand and critique the discovery. The rest of us merely struggle to interpret the results and how it changes the world as we know it. Nowhere is this more true than the science of the origins of our universe. In early 20th century, astronomers began to suspect that we live in an expanding universe. In the 1920s Edwin Hubble, after whom the Hubble telescope is named, realized that everywhere you look, galaxies are moving away from us. This led to the idea that, at the beginning of this expansion all the contents of our universe must have been concentrated in one place, from where it shot out in all directions, in other words, in the beginning there was an explosion, the Big Bang. Since we know how far the galaxies are from us today and also the rate at which they are receding from us, we can calculate the time at which it all began, around 13-14 billion years ago. In 1940s George Gamow and colleagues imagined that if the universe did indeed begin with a big bang, there must be residues of the ‘bang’ still reverberating through space. A prediction that was proved correct when in the 1960s Arno Penzias, Robert Wilson and Robert Dicke in their experiments encountered an annoying all-pervasive background radiation that wouldn’t go away. So after 14 billion years our world still resonates with the violence that began our universe.

Our imagination has carried us far. We have discovered much. But each discovery births new questions, new wonders, new boundaries to be breached, new walls to be scaled. As Ralph Sockman said, ‘the larger the island of knowledge, longer the shorelines of wonder’. 

But how much can we discover? Is there a limit to our knowledge? Do we still live inside a dome in the sky, no matter how big? Perhaps that dome is not in the sky, rather we carry it around with us, in our heads. The day we stop imagining, we would have found that dome. Nature is not an easily read book. It allows us only tiny glimpses of its secrets, opening only those windows we knock on. As long as we have the zeal to find a new window to knock, there will be secrets waiting to be discovered.  

Readings:
 A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson (an excellent light reading!)
A History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russell
Lots and lots of Google!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Obstacle Course to Being

Today, I got news that a close friend is in the early days of what might be a difficult pregnancy. Richard Dawkins’ opening remarks of his book “Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder” came to mind. He marvels at how statistic-numbingly lucky each one of us is to have survived the odds of a sperm and a ovum fusing and giving rise to a living cell. How we are a nanoscopically small number of the total combinations that are possible for the human genome. But as a developmental biologist, for me, this is just the starting point of the great obstacle course. The hurdles that the embryo will clear in the mother’s womb to make it to light and sunshine, warmth and fragrance, and the colours and music of this, our second home.  We see numerous reminders of each step that falters, in the birth defects that abound our world (according to statistics, 3-6% of infants born). A less than perfect infant brings anguish for the mother and potential disa...

Autism: Accepting our differences

April is Autism Awareness Month Priyam was the life of the party at the day care centre. A bright-eyed boy who captured the heart of the caretakers and played with abandon. Sometime after his second birthday, all this started changing. He stopped playing with his toys, he seemed more interested in organizing them now. He stopped talking, not even responding even when called by name. He stopped smiling at people and making eye contact. Then the rhythmic movements started; rocking his body, banging his head or repeatedly tapping on the table. One day he banged his head so much that when his father came hurriedly summoned by the caretaker, there was a trickle of blood running down his face. That was his last day at the centre; they refused to keep him after that.  Nancy was different. Growing up in a family with siblings and grandparents, she was used to people. But outsiders were studiously ignored. She heard all the questions and comments, but never acknowledged them. Loud noises, r...

Real or Imagined?

Real or Imagined? Right now I have a time-lapse experiment in progress at home. An infant beginning to appreciate that a person disappearing behind the curtain is not gone, just hidden; now a toddler who enlists me in pretend-play.  The neuronal circuits necessary for imagination are busy being built. The history of western art charts an analogous course for human civilization. Early examples of art relied heavily on ‘true-to-type’ representation of reality. From ancient Greece to Rome to Renaissance, art was all about how well you could recreate in stone or canvas what you see, as you see it. Parisians graduated to Impressionism when one day in 1874, Claude Monet’s ‘Impression, Sunrise’ (Impression, soleil levant) was unveiled. A few seemingly random strokes of paint on canvas, enough for us to visualize the luminescent descent of the sun into the sea, was equated to an unfinished wallpaper by the art connoisseurs of 19th century. How is it that a few daubs of pain...