Skip to main content

Homo naledi: an ancestor or a cousin?

This September a new member was added to our family tree1. His name is Homo naledi. He was found, two years ago, buried in the damp dark depths of the Dinaledi chamber of the Rising Star cave system in the archaeological hotspot known as the Cradle of Humankind in South Africa.

Two cavers while exploring in the caves accidentally broke through a crevice and discovered buried fossils of a human-like creature 30 metres below ground level. They took their news to Lee Berger, a paleoanthropologist and archaeologist at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Lee Berger was intrigued, but his large frame could never get through the 20 cm wide opening into the chambers were the fossils lay buried. But he had a plan.  
Paleoanthropologists are generally thought of as secretive scientists who shy away from limelight and conduct their research in dark obscure spaces, slowly and painstakingly brushing away the dust of millennia to uncover fragments of fossils that may tell a tantalizing story about our past. But Berger had a different style. When Berger realized he needed help with the excavation underground, he shot off an advertisement on Facebook® inviting people with archaeological, paleontological or excavation skills to come join his excavation; but he had other conditions, they should not be claustrophobic or afraid of the dark and they should be small.

The excavators he selected from the many who applied were six slender young women, who came to be known to the discovery team as the ‘Underground Astronauts’. They crawled through narrow openings, climbed up ragged walled caves and dropped down a chute into dark damp chambers where they for hours together excavated the fossils: gently, carefully, painstakingly.  They worked in 6 hour shifts for 21 days to uncover, surface-scan, photograph, clear the soil, label and pack the remains one by one to be send up to the base camp. A group of senior palaeontologists, anthropologists and archaeologists had assembled in an over-the-ground base camp to guide the below-ground excavators. The activity below was monitored through cameras and microphones and lights and scanners that fed into computers in the base camp. 

What the ‘Underground Astronauts’ brought up were nearly 1550 fossils that are thought to belong to 15 or more individuals of different ages of a species long gone. A large team of scientists assembled to study the remains. Each part of the body had specialists who were experts on that structure e.g. hands, head, feet and so on. The team of scientists released the conclusions of their analysis this September to describe a human-like creature. He had remarkable arched feet for balance, just like ours, suggesting he walked upright. He had agile fingers like ours with well developed thumb muscles for fine manipulation of tools. But, unlike ours, his long curved fingers could also help him grasp and climb like more primitive hominins. He stood as tall as us but his brain was less than half our size. So, why is this discovery creating the ripples in the news?

Homo sapiens, our species, is thought to have emerged around 200,000 years ago2. But the hominins, the larger group to which we belong, emerged around 7 million years ago. Australopithecus and Paranthropus groups, both more ancient than us, were more ape-like in their behaviour.  They climbed trees and but were beginning to walk upright; their brains though were much smaller suggesting lack of sophistication.

The genus Homo, containing perhaps our direct ancestors, Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis, Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergensis existed in the last 1-2 million years. The more recent members of the Homo genus emerged somewhere in the last half million years of so. The Homo genus were committed to walking upright and are not known to climb trees having lost the adaptations for climbing and grasping.

One of our most recent cousins, the Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) lived in Europe during the last ice age. Well adapted to the cold, they wore clothing, used tools and had cultural practices such as burying their dead. They were larger than us and their brains were as big as ours and sometimes bigger. Scientists believe that until their extinction around 40,000 years ago they coexisted, interacted and perhaps even interbred with humans in the cold climes of Europe. There are traces in our DNA that might have come from our Neanderthal cousins and mates.

Remains of another cousin of ours, Homo florensis, who perhaps also overlapped with modern humans, was discovered only a few years back on the Indonesian Island of Flores. The adult Homo florensis were no taller than a 3 year-old human child and had a brain one-third of ours. But they could hunt pigmy elephants with tools they made, make fire and cook meat. They lived successfully on the island till as late as 13,000 years ago, while the surrounding mainland was already inhabited by humans. But perhaps isolated from the surrounding mainland by kilometres of treacherous sea, humans and the Homo florensis never met.

So, what about Homo naledi? Did they ever meet us humans? Were they recent inhabitants of earth who retained their love for trees even as they walked and hunted on the ground? Or were they ancient cousins who came before the Homo genus descended from the trees? We do not know the answers to these questions. We do not know because, it has been very difficult to estimate the age of the Dinaledi fossils. Usually fossils are dated by the geological layer they are found in. The rock layers can be traced back to various volcanic eruptions, droughts, ice ages and other such major events on earth. But the Homo naledi was found in a deep cave in loose damp earth, with not even bones of other creatures nearby, which might have helped us guess at the era they lived in. Scientists are prepared for the long haul to determine the age of these fossils.

Until then we will be left wondering how did these creatures get inside a cave that is so inaccessible from the surface. They could not have accidentally strayed into a place so out of the way. Were they entombed there as part of some ancient burial ritual? How could creatures with half our brain size have concepts of afterlife and have cultural practices and burial rituals? Did they coexist with some other more intelligent species of the Homo genus? Did these compatriots dump them there, perhaps?

Like all scientific discoveries, this one finding opens up many more interesting, exciting questions. And like always the human mind will weave its stories about its own past, the only species that can encompass the whole past, present and future in its 1 kilo brain.

References
This article appeared in the ACE Academy magazine TRUMP in October 2015.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Obstacle Course to Being

Today, I got news that a close friend is in the early days of what might be a difficult pregnancy. Richard Dawkins’ opening remarks of his book “Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder” came to mind. He marvels at how statistic-numbingly lucky each one of us is to have survived the odds of a sperm and a ovum fusing and giving rise to a living cell. How we are a nanoscopically small number of the total combinations that are possible for the human genome. But as a developmental biologist, for me, this is just the starting point of the great obstacle course. The hurdles that the embryo will clear in the mother’s womb to make it to light and sunshine, warmth and fragrance, and the colours and music of this, our second home.  We see numerous reminders of each step that falters, in the birth defects that abound our world (according to statistics, 3-6% of infants born). A less than perfect infant brings anguish for the mother and potential disa...

Autism: Accepting our differences

April is Autism Awareness Month Priyam was the life of the party at the day care centre. A bright-eyed boy who captured the heart of the caretakers and played with abandon. Sometime after his second birthday, all this started changing. He stopped playing with his toys, he seemed more interested in organizing them now. He stopped talking, not even responding even when called by name. He stopped smiling at people and making eye contact. Then the rhythmic movements started; rocking his body, banging his head or repeatedly tapping on the table. One day he banged his head so much that when his father came hurriedly summoned by the caretaker, there was a trickle of blood running down his face. That was his last day at the centre; they refused to keep him after that.  Nancy was different. Growing up in a family with siblings and grandparents, she was used to people. But outsiders were studiously ignored. She heard all the questions and comments, but never acknowledged them. Loud noises, r...

Real or Imagined?

Real or Imagined? Right now I have a time-lapse experiment in progress at home. An infant beginning to appreciate that a person disappearing behind the curtain is not gone, just hidden; now a toddler who enlists me in pretend-play.  The neuronal circuits necessary for imagination are busy being built. The history of western art charts an analogous course for human civilization. Early examples of art relied heavily on ‘true-to-type’ representation of reality. From ancient Greece to Rome to Renaissance, art was all about how well you could recreate in stone or canvas what you see, as you see it. Parisians graduated to Impressionism when one day in 1874, Claude Monet’s ‘Impression, Sunrise’ (Impression, soleil levant) was unveiled. A few seemingly random strokes of paint on canvas, enough for us to visualize the luminescent descent of the sun into the sea, was equated to an unfinished wallpaper by the art connoisseurs of 19th century. How is it that a few daubs of pain...